At this point we’ve all seen the unfortunately worded, revised iPhone Developer Program License Agreement banning Flash, Java, Mono (and really any non-Apple-tooled) apps:

3.3.1 Applications may only use Documented APIs in the manner prescribed by Apple and must not use or call any private APIs. Applications must be originally written in Objective-C, C, C++, or JavaScript as executed by the iPhone OS WebKit engine, and only code written in C, C++, and Objective-C may compile and directly link against the Documented APIs (e.g., Applications that link to Documented APIs through an intermediary translation or compatibility layer or tool are prohibited).

A lot of insightful things have been written about this and I agree with much of what is being said. Flash developers are in an uproar and rightfully so. Longtime Apple users are switching back to Windows and looking to Android for their next mobile device. Open source advocates are horrified at what this means for computing in general. A lot more will be said before this is all over.

There are two items I’d like to submit to the discussion based upon my own experiences and observations:

1) The majority of Apple supporters have traditionally been users of Adobe software. Almost everyone I know at Adobe uses a MacBook Pro and carries around an iPhone. Adobe employees have consistently stated that they’d like to work with Apple to address any concerns over Flash and their iProducts. Apples recent actions are an affront to their traditional user base. What reason would there be for a company to turn against its foundation user base? Insanity.

2) While Adobe, Google, Mozilla, and various members of the Open Screen Project work to make Flash, browsers, and plugin architectures more integrated, stable and open; Apple remains within its own closed little bubble, refusing to play with anyone that doesn’t buy into their cleverly contrived App Store and now iAds (really!) ecosystem.

While the rest of the Web moves forward and tries to work together to improve things for everyone, Apple stands in the way with a closed system, elitist mentality, and insane policies.

Or are Mr. Jobs and Apple simply evil?

Got this one when I arrived home this evening. So we have a horrible stitch-job of seemingly random people all crammed together in what might pass for a 10 year old child’s first Photoshop project. That’s something I’ve learned to live with. Not everyone can design well, some people can’t design at all. Some people have no business even contemplating design. No big deal, right? Let’s look a little closer:

Wait a minute… the child… is that her name and a set of phone numbers taped to her chest? Oh yeah it is… wow. You can’t see it here as I’ve modified the image to remove the phone numbers- but sure as I sit here holding this abomination in my hands… you can read the numbers clear as day.

How does something like this get past the designer? How does it get past the approval process? How about the printer? No red flags anywhere along that chain, people??? Then they add the other girl staring directly into the name tag? Still nothing? How about now that I’ve drawn a green, glowing line-of-sight from her eyeball to the phone numbers? Ahhh… now someone might catch it.

Un-believable.

Most recently stumbled across the following compilation error (fatal warning?) when working with the “New Flash Component” feature of Flash Builder 4:

Warning: 5002: The main timeline’s frame scripts have been ignored because a compiled clip contains a definition for fl.livepreview.LivePreviewParent. To override the fl.livepreview.LivePreviewParent definition, place a custom class file within your classpath.

Obviously, Flash is generating code for the Runtime Armature which is conflicting with code for the Flash Component for use in Flash Builder. Ugh…

I’m working on some demos for my FITC presentation during the MAX unconference in October. This is by no means a show stopper but what an annoyance… Half the time when working with Runtime Armatures in CS4, Flash will just totally crash and burn. I have great luck with Armatures during authoring- the runtime stuff just always seems to bite me.

Bug filed:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FB-22221

UPDATE: I have confirmation that this is fixed in Flash CS5.

Realizing that Flash is a better name than Flex for a platform, Adobe is now referring to everything it does related to Flash (including the Flash Player, Adobe AIR, Flex developer tools, and Flash media servers) as the Flash Platform.

Picked up via Chuck Freedman.

I’ve been using an M-Audio Delta Audiophile 2496 for years now in 32-bit systems: both Windows XP and Vista.  This is a great card- massive clarity above anything else I’ve ever tried.  I’ve produced a ton of projects off of this card and it is tightly integrated into my studio cabling at this point.

Recently, I upgraded my hardware and took advantage of 8GB of RAM.  To actually utilize that amount of RAM, you need a 64-bit OS. The whole point of this rant is that M-Audio still do not have any drivers for this card for 64-bit Vista.  They don’t have any public beta drivers either- the drivers in private beta.

I signed up for the beta but am not holding my hopes very high.  I suppose I can just deal with onboard audio until they release the drivers- but I wouldn’t want to actually record anything using that…

Just a real cramp in my gut.  Let’s have at them drivers, already!

I’ve stumbled across something that I cannot understand in one of our Java applications.  This is something that worked fine in 10.0.0.525 but is now broken in 10.0.12.36:

Simply put- a SWF (any SWF) that has loaded just fine in all previous versions of the Flash Player (including FP10 RC builds) now completely fails to load.  I’ve looked at a number of different things but cannot figure this one out!

I’ll update this as I find answers.

The primary reason for jumping ship was that, over the past few months, the database servers were slower than molasses during an arctic winter. This website is heavy on that end, of course, and at times it would take 30-60 seconds to load! That’s insane. On the new host it is instantaneous. I’ve noticed that static sites load a lot faster as well- even large photographs through Flash (FileReference) have a much higher delivery speed.

PowWeb was bought out by Endurance International last year and ever since then, things have been getting worse and worse. I feel a bit bad having to leave after so many years- but am very pleased with BlueHost so far. I heard lots of negative comments about the new owners during the takeover, but I like to be fair and give people the benefit of a doubt… bad choice, in this particular case.

Although the DNS propagation is ongoing, just about everything is in place. My ISP only has the updated DNS records for half of the domains- so I’m actually writing this update through VPN to my office machine.

Many thanks to those who recommended hosting providers after my initial rant. Very helpful information!